Re: The likelihood of a false positive in this case is substantial
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TEC Message Board ]
Re: The likelihood of a false positive in this case is substantial
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TEC Message Board ]
Posted by buckeye3
on July 02, 2009 at 19:30:50:
In Reply to: Re: The likelihood of a false positive in this case is substantial posted by Why Not on July 02, 2009 at 19:18:44:
"Plus, why didn't Mayfield go out on May 9th and get another test (hair, urine and blood)?"
You don't know that he didn't. Those guns, if they have them, are saved for the main case. Jeremy signed a sworn statement that he never used Meth. Doing so opens him up to Federal perjury charges if he lied. Feds love perjury traps these days. Easy convictions. Ask Martha Stewart.